An International Ordnance Survey? – It’s the taking part that counts.

As our Great British Athletes in Team GB are demonstrating; in the Olympics… it’s not the winning that counts…it’s the taking part and the way you play the game 😉

China and Indonesia disqualified for not playing the game
It’s the way you play that counts!

I just caught this official news after much rumouring around the network in the past few months, Ordnance Survey are now going International. Great Britain’s National Mapping Agency will offer “expert advice and services across the full spectrum of Ordnance Survey’s expertise, including data collection and maintenance, product development and geospatial data management.”…primarily to “support other national mapping agencies and their countries.” Great news! After all, why keep all the expertise to yourself. But we have to wish for a little Team GB spirit from our national mapping agency (don’t follow the example of China and Indonesia today at the Olympics!). And we have to hope that OS can recognise and encourage the team effort that has enabled its strong reputation.

Whenever there is a government intervention for a “greater good” there are both winners and losers. So when Vince Cable, our Business Secretary says “I look forward to seeing their knowledge being put to good use around the world and furthering the reputation of British business abroad.” it strikes feelings of both hope and fear for OS’s eco system of suppliers, partners, associates and competition.

Does the pursuit of the “greater good” have to have a victim? Often, Yes. Quantitative Easing (a money printing intervention supported by both our recent governments) takes money from people’s savings to support collapsing banks. The “greater good” is in maintaining a stable “looking” economy so the world continues to invest in the UK. This may work if the banks take part fairly and share this view of the common good.  So far our banks don’t look very sporting!  The victim?  You and me!

However, as Vince points out, unlike the banks, OS has a more sporting reputation for partnership and the early signs are positive. The spirit of team-work, I am sure, will be at the heart of the plan as the software and systems created in the huge Phoenix project (deriving all map products from a single database) could be packaged for international customers and involve returns for the partners who helped to build it.

Also helpful for us all may be the prevailing view from those who work within Ordnance Survey.  The culture still comes from its strong heritage where accuracy, reliability and currency come far ahead of profits.  For its employees a message that OS is increasing its revenue potential will never wash.  Their “greater good” and sense of purpose will more naturally align with Vince’s vision.  But rightfully they will also recognise that this is new territory with little or no precedent for Ordnance Survey.

It is critical therefore that Ordnance Survey recognises it needn’t employ the talent required for this success.  It needs to be agile in this new venture.   Success will be in reliance upon the eco system already in place in the UK, approaching new opportunities together and growing the sector as a community.

Many of the system suppliers and consultants in the market already rely upon an international portfolio. So such a large and significant player entering the market could be pure competition right across the board.   To get to this position I am sure Ordnance Survey has already been negotiating with potential customers and this solo effort has the greatest potential for negatively impacting the market potential for UK business.

Steven Ramage (having recently left the Open Geospatial Consortium) will lead Ordnance Surveys foray across the globe. Steve will need to view this role, not as a pure commercial revenue increasing incentive to support OS’s trading fund status.  Instead it is an opportunity to benefit the whole of GB by developing an expertise in collaboration in this specialist and rapidly growing market of Location Services.  Steve, “we’re better together” 😉

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “An International Ordnance Survey? – It’s the taking part that counts.

  1. I am ex OS International (1995-2002) and have been providing international consultancy ever since. I have still to get a reply to my email to OS on 2nd August relating to potential collaboration so maybe your first option “a pure commercial revenue increasing incentive to support OS’s trading fund status” was right.

    1. Hi Mark
      I dug through the web sites of the Ordnance Survey and found the accredited consultant scheme. Though I know this programme has gone through a few itterations, perhaps this is the vehicle OS plan to use to engage externals in the international adventures? My sources indicate they may not have put these two things together yet … and having just looked at the application forms… they are not very targetted at we International types (no mention of travel for example ;-)).
      David

  2. Hi All
    The news from OS’s Accredited Consultant team is: “The accreditation programme is not directly related to the new international work of Ordnance Survey. The accredited consultant programme recognises individuals that have expertise related to Ordnance Survey products and services. There is no commercial contract between Ordnance Survey and individual consultants. My colleagues in the international team understand the accreditation programme but the initiative is not directly linked with our international objectives.” Also I missed the deadline to join the AC programme… a new round will start in November.
    David

  3. Hi David,
    I was a member of the OS Accredited Consultant team and was phoned by OS about a year ago to request that the logo was taken off my website. I was told that the scheme would be starting up again but when I saw the cost involved for the honour of joining I decided against it. Not sure what its status is now, it seems to have been on the back burner for a while till they work out what to do with it, but your message above seems to indicate that they don’t see it as part of their “international objectives”
    My emails of 2nd August and 6th Sep on the subject, copied to OS Customer Services, still remain unanswered from OS – perhaps they’re trying to tell me something!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s